Correct to exclude re-signalling faults when measuring rail reliability

Media Replies 03 Aug 2017

We refer to Mr Chan Yeow Chuan (“Biased figures on MRT breakdown rate”, 29 Jul) and Mr Tan Shao Yi’s (“Use more meaningful measures in evaluating the MRT”, 31 Jul) letters on measuring our rail reliability.  

Improving rail reliability is a multi-year effort. The purpose of the MKBF (Mean Kilometres Between Failure, for delays more than 5 minutes) indicator is to track our progress from year to year, and to provide an objective benchmark for comparison with other metros. We benchmark ourselves against both Hong Kong and Taipei as these two cities boast metros which are objectively best-in-class for reliability, and for which some data is available.

Besides the MKBF, we also track the absolute number of delays more than 30 minutes. Reporting on these longer delays in absolute terms is more intuitive for the public, given also their relatively smaller numbers.

Re-signalling on the North-South and East-West Lines takes place once every 30 years or so. Even though we have tried to minimise it, delays during the testing phase will invariably occur. Including such delays into the MKBF will not give an accurate nor fair picture of the underlying rail reliability or railway maintenance performance.

We ask for commuters’ patience. Once the new signalling system stabilises, commuters on the North-South and East-West Lines will enjoy a more reliable train system and more frequent trains. 


Ngien Hoon Ping
Chief Executive
Land Transport Authority 

Scroll To Top

Welcome to the


This quick tour will bring you through the key enhancements.

Use the links at the top navigation bar to help you find what you are looking for

Jump straight into the popular pages that

are most relevant to you

Taking a bus, train, or cycling to your

destination? Plan your routes and check

the fares using these tools!

Our latest featured projects are just a click away!

Start exploring the new


Explore Now!